[Heeplist] Heeplist] No apologizes (translation)

Kevin Milanowski 11scorpio06 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 10:36:58 EST 2014


Thanks Bob, I think you more clearly clarified my point... There are many
of us out here happy to have Heep still out and making new records... The
reason I joined this list was to share with other people of LIKE MINDS the
thoughts and enjoyment that we obviously share. While obviously the
original lineups of heep were undeniably the best... The current
incarnation, who I have seen perform and still enjoy the new releases still
make me smile and make me happy so I will continue to enjoy this
incarnation despite what others may say... Thank You Mick may we have some
more...appy days...Kevin
On Nov 18, 2014 6:55 AM, "Bob Winward" <uriahheep at comcast.net> wrote:

> I get Igor's point now and I know many do not agree.  What he seems to be
> saying is current Uriah Heep is a watered down version of the 1972 era
> Uriah
> Heep, with only one original member left.  I got that from another recent
> post where he says Trevor and Lee are gone.
>
> Now I ask, is there anyone on the list that thinks current Uriah Heep is
> better than the 1972 verison?  Ok, that is a rhetorical question as I doubt
> anyone will say that.
>
> The majority of us feel we are lucky that there is a version of Uriah Heep
> that makes us happy and puts out great new music.  We celebrate the past,
> yet embrace the "now"  (our Heep glasses are half full)
>
> So Igor while you have a valid point, you continue to belabor such point
> into ad nauseam.  Your help glass is half empty or maybe a drop left, lol
> :-))  I do have a question, if they are so bad and so watered down and such
> shells of their former selves, why are you here?  To celebrate the past and
> reject the now?
>
> One last question, do you have a band in mind that is playing now that does
> live up to your expectations and that you are a huge fan of?  As some of us
> over obsessed, pie in the sky Heep fans on the list?
>
> Perhaps I should simply rephrase: Are you a fanatic of any current band?
>
> Just aksing here, not trying to cause trouble, only trying to figure out
> why
> you bash the current incarnation of Uriah Heep over and over on a list of
> fans?  Are we to be college fraternity pledges who are naked on hands and
> knees and every time get spanked, have to scream out "Thank you sir, may I
> please have some more"?
>
>
> On 11/17/14 4:47 PM, "Igor Shveitser" <zlenko_iv at mail.ru> wrote:
>
> >  We are talking at cross purposes, Merrick: you treat all that as Uriah
> Heep,
> > I obviously do not. Still, the latest modification of Heep plays pretty
> much
> > the same AOR/modern hard rock since the late 80-s, and I can't see where
> they
> > are being experimental :) The compositions are good, but they are made in
> > accordance to several musical models, patterns,whatever you call them.
> Gypsy
> > was different, but that's another band and another story altogether.
> Cheers,
> > Igor
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heeplist mailing list
> Heeplist at travellersintime.com
> http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
>
> Travellers in Time Website
> http://www.travellersintime.com
>
> Official Uriah Heep Website
> http://www.uriah-heep.com
>



More information about the Heeplist mailing list