[Heeplist] [Bulk] Re: Outsider revisited

[Igor Shveitser]

 Bob,
I must agree about evolving of the sound from the evolution point of view, for all flows and all changes. As regards the Heep thing, it is a delicate one. To me any album of the 70-s featuring John is no less valuable than Demons or Look. The same relates to any album of the era featuring Ken (Conquest inclusive). Happy? I am happy the current line up is still needed and can deliver what the faithful demand but myself prefer them being themselves and playing their own music. I like it much-much more than their versions of Lady in Black etc.
Cheers, Igor


Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:21:31 -0500 от Bob Winward <uriahheep at comcast.net>:
>What about Firefly, IV and Fallen Angel?  Would you classify that as classic
>era?  I am going to guess no, so by 1977 UH was not even classic.
>
>So I agree thoroughly, that current Heep is great, but I doubt there is any
>delusional ones among us that think they are better than 1972.  In my
>opinion there is evolving of sound over many decades and personnel changes.
>I for one am happy that there is still an incarnation of the band.  If they
>couldn't sound classic in 1980, how could we expect that now???
>
>
>On 11/14/14 8:05 PM, "Wayne Catalbe" < 2robcatway at att.net > wrote:
>
>>
>> 
>> The current band is a great rock band, but it's not classic era Uriah Heep.
>> 
>> Wayne 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Heeplist mailing list
>Heeplist at travellersintime.com
>http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
>
>Travellers in Time Website
>http://www.travellersintime.com
>
>Official Uriah Heep Website
>http://www.uriah-heep.com