[Heeplist] A 2 review on Amazon

Bob Winward uriahheep at comcast.net
Tue Jun 24 07:38:46 EDT 2014


Hi Igor, thank you for pointing out.  :-)  I am the standard bearer for
Uriah Heep Trueness!!

I would give Live in Moscow a 5!  Heep comes back from the dead with a new
vocalist and keyboard player.   Abominog a 4, great record but such a
drastic change in sound and personnel and too many cover tunes..  I wonder
if the magic and wizardry disappeared when Ken Hensley did??!!!  I think so,
and it is my opinion.  During the 70's, I never thought of Heep as Mick's
band, but Ken's band.

I would give both RTS and Different World 4.5's
RTS first new Studio cd with revised lineup and had a lot of rocking
variety.
Different World, does not sound like it belongs in a Heep catalog, but I
think it is a strong POP offering.  Every song on it sounds like a hit
single.  Yes lightweight and poppy, but very well written lyrics and
melodies.

Even a 5 does not give SOL enough credit, but it is the mark of perfection
and Heep's peak (post 70's)



On 6/23/14 12:35 PM, "Igor Shveitser" <zlenko_iv at mail.ru> wrote:

 I think, each of 
> us has his own "true Heep" as well ... and it might be very different from
> Bob's :)))) And in this regard I have a few questions for all of you. The
> first one: if we, connoisseurs of Heep art, take that Heep classics deserve an
> excellent mark (which is five), what will you give to the likes of 82-91
> albums? OK, here goes the second one: Sea Of Light was a bit different (still
> not a masterpiece in my rating due to some redundant stuff) but overall can
> anyone say the material that was penned in the 90-s - 2000-s is on the same
> level of wizardry as it was in the 70-s? I am more than sure, some people
> can't explain but that is what they really miss.






More information about the Heeplist mailing list