[Heeplist] 13

[Iain Barnes]

Totally agree, sounds like early sabbath and I like early sabbath. If this had been one of their first albums it would have fit well in that era. Only played it today so need more listens.

Thanks Iain

On 17 Jun 2013, at 16:09, Jay Pearson <deepheep at yahoo.com> wrote:

> To my ears, it is classic Sabbath, very much in the vein of the early albums. I hear plenty of melody, but early Sabbath style. It is not Dio-era Sabbath, which generally had more memorable melodies, but it is heavy, sludgy, slow mixed with some double-time. There is some variety, but not a whole lot, the drummer is the most interesting instrument. Overall, as I listen, it sounds like 1970 all over again. Great album, I think it fits great with any of their first 6 albums.
> 
> Jay
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Среда, 12 июня 2013, 7:34 -04:00 от Bob Winward <uriahheep at comcast.net>:
>> Out of fairness, I will give it a few more listens as promised.  There is
>> one track that I heard on Satellite radio called Loner and the guitar work
>> on that has more range.  Today I have about 4 hours of driving again, will
>> give the BS it's due dilligence.   On first listen, every track sounded the
>> same and I cannot hear why every one raves about Tony Iomni.  He plays the
>> same riffs on every song.  Maybe I just need to give it a few more listens.
> _______________________________________________
> Heeplist mailing list
> Heeplist at travellersintime.com
> http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
> 
> Travellers in Time Website
> http://www.travellersintime.com
> 
> Official Uriah Heep Website
> http://www.uriah-heep.com