[Heeplist] Heeplist] No apologizes (translation)

[Mark Layel]

     hey people,
                 when i first saw Uriah Heep, kerslake and thain had not
joined yet.
                i've alwaysed liked them
                              cheers,
                                      mark
On Nov 18, 2014 10:37 AM, "Kevin Milanowski" <11scorpio06 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Bob, I think you more clearly clarified my point... There are many
> of us out here happy to have Heep still out and making new records... The
> reason I joined this list was to share with other people of LIKE MINDS the
> thoughts and enjoyment that we obviously share. While obviously the
> original lineups of heep were undeniably the best... The current
> incarnation, who I have seen perform and still enjoy the new releases still
> make me smile and make me happy so I will continue to enjoy this
> incarnation despite what others may say... Thank You Mick may we have some
> more...appy days...Kevin
> On Nov 18, 2014 6:55 AM, "Bob Winward" <uriahheep at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > I get Igor's point now and I know many do not agree.  What he seems to be
> > saying is current Uriah Heep is a watered down version of the 1972 era
> > Uriah
> > Heep, with only one original member left.  I got that from another recent
> > post where he says Trevor and Lee are gone.
> >
> > Now I ask, is there anyone on the list that thinks current Uriah Heep is
> > better than the 1972 verison?  Ok, that is a rhetorical question as I
> doubt
> > anyone will say that.
> >
> > The majority of us feel we are lucky that there is a version of Uriah
> Heep
> > that makes us happy and puts out great new music.  We celebrate the past,
> > yet embrace the "now"  (our Heep glasses are half full)
> >
> > So Igor while you have a valid point, you continue to belabor such point
> > into ad nauseam.  Your help glass is half empty or maybe a drop left, lol
> > :-))  I do have a question, if they are so bad and so watered down and
> such
> > shells of their former selves, why are you here?  To celebrate the past
> and
> > reject the now?
> >
> > One last question, do you have a band in mind that is playing now that
> does
> > live up to your expectations and that you are a huge fan of?  As some of
> us
> > over obsessed, pie in the sky Heep fans on the list?
> >
> > Perhaps I should simply rephrase: Are you a fanatic of any current band?
> >
> > Just aksing here, not trying to cause trouble, only trying to figure out
> > why
> > you bash the current incarnation of Uriah Heep over and over on a list of
> > fans?  Are we to be college fraternity pledges who are naked on hands and
> > knees and every time get spanked, have to scream out "Thank you sir, may
> I
> > please have some more"?
> >
> >
> > On 11/17/14 4:47 PM, "Igor Shveitser" <zlenko_iv at mail.ru> wrote:
> >
> > >  We are talking at cross purposes, Merrick: you treat all that as Uriah
> > Heep,
> > > I obviously do not. Still, the latest modification of Heep plays pretty
> > much
> > > the same AOR/modern hard rock since the late 80-s, and I can't see
> where
> > they
> > > are being experimental :) The compositions are good, but they are made
> in
> > > accordance to several musical models, patterns,whatever you call them.
> > Gypsy
> > > was different, but that's another band and another story altogether.
> > Cheers,
> > > Igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Heeplist mailing list
> > Heeplist at travellersintime.com
> >
> http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
> >
> > Travellers in Time Website
> > http://www.travellersintime.com
> >
> > Official Uriah Heep Website
> > http://www.uriah-heep.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Heeplist mailing list
> Heeplist at travellersintime.com
> http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
>
> Travellers in Time Website
> http://www.travellersintime.com
>
> Official Uriah Heep Website
> http://www.uriah-heep.com
>