[Heeplist] (no subject)

[Igor Shveitser]

 I believe, they are very much alike, except for that Sloman lacks screaming Gillan (more Arthur Brown, actually) qualities and abilities. He is not that powerful. But he has his softer unique sounds that are his very own. And he was great for the music. Plus, he was a great songwriter.
Cheer, Igor
P.S. I can't imagine anyone else singing on Conqest, John S. did a fantastic job. As for the later Heep albums, I believe Abominog might have been improved had David or John L. sang on it. However, that trick wouldn't do for the rest of the 80-s stuff :)))


Sat, 13 Sep 2014 20:21:50 -0700 от DAVID M SHERROD <porcupineheep at cox.net>:
>I think if you like Glenn Hughes, you might like Sloman, though Glenn is far better at that wild style, except singing live in Purple where he was most always out of control very much like Sloman in Heep. Had Sloman sang like he dose on his solo album's, and Praying Mantis Conquest would have been much better.. Dave S
>
>Don Malecic < docofun at gmail.com > wrote:
>>So I listened to Conquest again tonight, instrumentally they sound good but
>>, has no power like outsider and again someone is out of pitch on the
>>vocals, it's Sloman!
>>It's like he tries to hard.
>>A
>>_______________________________________________
>>Heeplist mailing list
>> Heeplist at travellersintime.com
>> http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
>>
>>Travellers in Time Website
>> http://www.travellersintime.com
>>
>>Official Uriah Heep Website
>> http://www.uriah-heep.com
>_______________________________________________
>Heeplist mailing list
>Heeplist at travellersintime.com
>http://travellersintime.com/mailman/listinfo/heeplist_travellersintime.com
>
>Travellers in Time Website
>http://www.travellersintime.com
>
>Official Uriah Heep Website
>http://www.uriah-heep.com